Welcome! Click here to login or here to register.
 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||||
"Mismatch uracil glycosylase from Escherichia coli: a general mismatch or a specific DNA glycosylase?" |
O'Neill RJ, Vorob'eva OV, Shahbakhti H, Zmuda E, Bhagwat AS, Baldwin GS |
Published June 6, 2003 in J Biol Chem volume 278 .
Pubmed ID: 12668677
Abstract:
| The gene for the mismatch-specific uracil glycosylase (MUG) was identified in the Escherichia coli genome as a sequence homolog of the mammalian thymine DNA glycosylase, with activity against uracil in U.G mismatches. Subsequently, 3,N4-ethenocytosine (epsilonC), thymine, 5-hydroxymethyluracil, and 8-(hydroxymethyl)-3,N4-ethenocytosine have been proposed as possible substrates for this enzyme. The evaluation of various DNA adducts as substrates is complicated by the biphasic nature of the kinetics of this enzyme. Our results demonstrate that product release by the enzyme is very slow and hence comparing the "steady-state" parameters of the enzyme for different substrates is of limited use. Consequently, the ability of the enzyme to excise a variety of damage products of purines and pyrimidines was studied under single turnover conditions. Although the enzyme excised both epsilonC and U from DNA, the former adduct was significantly better as a substrate in terms of binding and hydrolysis. Some products of oxidative and alkylation damage are also moderately good substrates for the enzyme, but thymine is a poor substrate. This comparison of different substrates under single turnover conditions provides a rational basis for comparing substrates of MUG and we relate these conclusions to the known crystal structures of the enzyme and its catalytic mechanism. |
This publication refers to following REPAIRtoire entries:
| Proteins |
Last modification of this entry: Oct. 6, 2010
Add your own comment!
There is no comment yet.
|
|
|
|